pistol brace ban reddit

Don't incriminate yourself or others by what you post; for example, refrain from posting images of non-CA compliant rifles, as others may assume that you own an illegal "assault weapon". Sadly, the first part of the comment is factually incorrect. You know what looks kind of similar? …as a “brace”. Tax law may be different. [–]treefaeller 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (1 child). An adult trying to shoot a kid's rifle with a a 10" or 12" LOP. Now that i found the link to it i will for sure be commenting. “White House orders pistol braces to be banned” Imagine clicking on your favorite news site or gun blog and reading those very words. Do you feel that 'circumventing' a law is an illegal act? For all of those who don’t want to put this information, we live in CA. Not a Pistol Brace Ban…Yet Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with “Stabilizing Braces” The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (``ATF'') is publishing the objective factors it considers when evaluating firearms with an attached stabilizing brace to determine whether they are considered firearms under the National Firearms Act … You don't and I don't, but SCOTUS does. This guidance comes after a lot of quesitons as to when you could or could not put a vertical foregrip on an AR pistol. Please include full name and mailing address. The mag is not removable so it isn't an assault weapon under NY law. No, circumventing the law is not an illegal act, at least not most of the time, with common criminal and civil law. I sure hope FPC and GOA are ready to file a fucking massive lawsuit against them for a litany of Const amendment violations. It's clearly spelled out - the writing of regulations is the writing of law and the sole domain of the legislature. Do you mean now that Barr has resigned? The ATF has suddenly and unexpectedly backed off on its efforts to force owners of pistol braces to register their firearms equipped with them under the NFA. The comment will get discarded.. [–]problemgrumblingTHE ANSWER IS 10(MM) 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (11 children). This is again a right to be taken from us that won’t solve a thing. I suppose this comment 'won't be counted', then. So yes, if a vendor creates a thing that is made out of 5 pounds of bacon, but it carefully designed to easily clip to the back of a Glock and be shouldered (how the heck to do this is left as an exercise for a mechanical engineering student ...), then it is a gun stock, and the Glock with the stock becomes an SBR. You’re a doofus. I didn't read the entire thing, but I was under the impression they they are still treated the same as pistols, just registered. Thread starter Sean K. Start date Oct 7, 2020; Sean K. Well-Known Member. Moving back out to Cali tomorrow. If you are just writing "to be counted", don't even bother. As per reddit's new rules, all advertising, selling, or trading of firearms, ammunition, or accessories are now prohibited. You can believe your wrong version as much as you want, but it won't get you anywhere. Then will immediately come the ban of AR/AK pistols as they are already setting it up. Use shop42a.com when shopping on Amazon and part of your purchase will be donated to the Calguns Foundation. I guess it could be theoretically possible to strap a brace to one's forearm and try to fire an AR pistol single-handed, but that seems like a really bad idea for anyone who can instead use both arms, given the weight and recoil of that thing, and the very unergonomic weight distribution of the AR platform. I've played this game before (not with the ATF, with the CA DoJ), and some of my comments were quoted in the report. A recent post circulating Facebook may just highlight things to come. In addition, there is no such thing as a stupid question. the legislature (congress) has given the ATF the power to write regulation, and enforce it. In these cases, it's better to be safe than sorry. They will never learn. Treat all guns as if they're loaded (even when you know they aren't). Visit Calguns.net to discuss 2nd Amendment politics and activism issues and learn about California litigation and legal updates. Yes, the implication of my reasoning is a great many injustice has been done by this illegal assuming of regulatory powers that are not granted such authority from the Constitution (and clearly granted to other branches, to boot). Politics / … 'Do it I dare you' is a poor argument when debating law. [–]gegunner1 2 points3 points4 points 2 months ago (2 children). IMG Jim Grant The Department of Justice told the ATF’s industry side not to move on pistol braces … All said power arises from the Constitution's seperation. In was back in 2013 when inventor Alex Bosco came up with the pistol brace and after letter back from BATFE about the legality of the newly created device Bosco found himself in partnership with Sig Sauer and the SB-15 pistol brace … Regulation is law and the ATF has no power to create such, and no power to assume such if the legislature refuses to address it within their domain. I have not seen very many braces myself, only a few at the range. I don't know of any NY law that would ban a folding brace… Technical Note: while an SBR — a short barreled rifle — is regulated by the NFA, enforced by the ATF, and is a special class of firearm requiring registration, payment of a $200 tax, and other restrictions (e.g. Rendered by PID 21793 on r2-app-02c35fe1cfb66f0d8 at 2021-02-23 23:27:23.816528+00:00 running b1d2781 country code: US. Even justices get it wrong.. often. Armed with Knowledge. Do not copy and paste another comment you found. Don’t include your name and address? Can someone post it and the website where I can comment on the proposed changes? Is there any reason that a law folding brace wouldn't be legal? [–]dL_EVO[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (1 child). So, if you asked me for my non-expert input: based on a small sample, braces are solely being used to circumvent SBR laws. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5881/attachments/original/1608175224/SBCriteria.AS_SUBMITTED.pdf?1608175224, BREAKING: ATF to Issue Guidance on “Stabilizing Braces”. If they can't ban the firearms they want to ban then they just create new rules to turn most owners into overnight felons stripping them of their rights ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Share. It's a free gun registry masquerading as free stamps. I just purchased a ruger charger pistol and have seen many videos online of adding a pistol brace, which is apparently legal as long as you do not intentionally shoulder the firearm. Regulation is law and the ATF has no power to create such. If you 'shoulder' five pounds of wrapped bacon and press a handgun into it do you feel that the bacon legally becomes a gun stock? The Pistol Brace is NOT A STOCK, but can be used on AK47, AR15 ,FAL, and other Style Pistols available © 2021 reddit inc. All rights reserved. The best AR-15 pistol stabilizing brace is in a league of its own, and its own price bracket. There is a legal pathway to changing the wording and interpretation of the Constitution, but it involves a Congress, not the writing of a law. I don't think anything in law, regulation or common sense says that gun stocks have to be made out of walnut and not out of bacon. Or do you mean the ATF meeting with the Biden team recently? The Gun Politics subreddit is about sharing news, articles, stories and events related to guns & politics as well as discussion surrounding gun politics. Fortunately, things like the Super Redhawk and the Glock 20 are already legally available to serve that need. Know your target and what is beyond it (avoid any and all collateral damage). The Gun Politics subreddit is about sharing news, articles, stories and events … Sorry, that's complete nonsense. The legislature has ** no** power to allow others to exercise the legislative privileges proscribed in the Constitution. However, ATF is absolutely attempting to crack down on what it will consider a pistol… I have a AR pistol with a pinned magazine. The due date is 01/04/21, Link for more information: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/18/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces, [–]cragolf 4 points5 points6 points 2 months ago (0 children). “Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further DOJ review, the notice and request for comments entitled, “Objective Factors … and join one of thousands of communities. Don’t think it can Tag: Brace ban. [–]problemgrumblingTHE ANSWER IS 10(MM) -2 points-1 points0 points 2 months ago (0 children). Ban this dick fedboi. I am far more offended at the constant and often successful attempts to exceed the Constitutional bounds of power than the mere language of my complaint. Press J to jump to the feed. Various styles of attachment allow the braces to be custom fit to any user. The MCX pistol with a folding brace is super compact and easy to carry. discuss 2nd Amendment politics and activism, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/18/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces. A Pistol Stabilizing Brace uses the shooter’s forearm to provide significant support and balance, thereby minimizing shift and spin that affect accuracy. We were able to be effective when they were trying to ban M855 ammo. I've played this game before (not with the ATF, with the CA DoJ), and some of my comments were quoted in the report. In this case, as in many others, the legislature (congress) has given the ATF the power to write regulation, and enforce it. Or what about the ar-9? The History of the Brace . Refuse to register. First Name Sean Joined Jul 24, 2018 Messages 3,209 Reaction score 3,996 Location AZ ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Link Forums. You are currently reading "ATF Withdraws Pistol Brace Guidance", entry #26486 on The Captain's Journal.This article is filed under the category(s) BATFE and was published December 23rd, 2020 by Herschel Smith. You don't seem to understand the legal landscape. Home. It's not a stock it's a brace as declared by atf. So yes, they do get to write regulation. Or, better said, partial pistol brace ban. And if 90% of the comments received are clueless stuff like that, that doesn't look good. Pistol brace design has evolved over time, but this classic pistol brace remains of the industries favorites. 51 votes, 37 comments. Pistols fitted with a stabilizing brace that once measured more than 26″ overall length (exempting it from NFA regulations) are now not allowed to include the brace in its overall length measurement with the vertical foregrip, meaning if it now falls under 26″ under the new measurement, they are now subject to NFA regulation unless the foregrip is removed. Sponsored Content Open Source Defense: ... As we discussed yesterday, the comment period is open for the ATF’s proposed rulemaking on certain pistol stabilizing braces. A very well known firearms lawyer … If you have a good argument for why braces should be legal ... write it. We're here not only to discuss but to educate; users may not have seen previous posts so we highly encourage re-posts rather than forbid them and recommend waiting at least a week before re-posting. We need to ban together regardless if you own a pistol brace or not. They made it pretty clear we cannot use profanity in comments or they won’t be counted. So you can't put a stock or vertical grip or anything else that you couldn't previously. If you submit this comment, it will immediately go into the waste basket. If you own a pistol brace listen up because this affects you. would it go back to 18 since essentially the ar pistol is no more? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Just need some better iron sights that aren’t these cheap amazon ones. LOUNGE. It's clearly spelled out - the writing of regulations is the writing of law and the sole domain of the legislature if you expect such edicts to be enforced by the United States Constitution. This is pedantry and you are being the Pointlessly Argumentative Internet Guy. Fuck the NFA and their attempting to make laws by writing a goddamn letter. The comment will be discarded. The legislature cannot give the ATF power to write law. If you deem a regulation a law then an office of the Executive branch has no right to create them. Use this sub to discuss and ask questions about California's gun laws and politics. It doesn't appear in any feeds, and anyone with a direct link to it will see a message like this one. I wouldn't see why, you can put a pistol brace on a pistol and it doesn't become a rifle, short barrel or otherwise (although I'm not sure if NYS has ever ruled on that, and we all know that they pay about as much attention to the federal definitions for these things as … I’ll highlight some insights a number of others have already brought up, but let’s start with a big one that I think is the crux of the matter: The “holistic” approach the ATF brass is embracing. The few braces I saw in the flesh were clearly being used as shoulder stocks; it is actually super easy to spot them at the range, because it looks like someone is firing an SBR with a really silly stock (sort of hunched over and folded). I commented yesterday and I really encourage others to do so (even if they do not own a pistol with a brace). I know. The California Assault Weapon Identification Flowchart, The California Handgun Identification Flowchart, The California Shotgun Identification Flowchart. The ATF's power is enforcement ONLY, and regulation is only in the assistance of enforcement, not the 'clarification' of the lawful directive. AR-15 Pistol Brace. Along comes this bullshit “arm brace” which we all know is a fake description of a shoulder stock, and the industry tries to make it out as actually something people use to “stabilize” a pistol. Avoid abusive language. THEREFORE THEY ARE LEGAL. How's that comment? Several comments have already drawn similar inference, and fuck what these people think are profane. The title references the news arriving tomorrow and you can reasonably consider the comment period as one step of the overall ban. More posts from the gunpolitics community. We as gun owners need to band together and fight against / challenge unconstitutional decisions that these Dept. "You're not an office of the Legislature, you don't get to write the rules of law. "Regulation is law", and "The ATF has no power to create regulation"? Pistol Brace Legality In WA Hello Wa_guns! We have weapons registered to us already, CA DOJ has this information already. It's nice for your side of the argument that most courts in the land of the law accept it, but it's nice for my side of the argument that there has been constant surpassing of the limits of governing power by all branches in many cases; one example the claim that the Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution itself, when the Judiciary is granted only the power to interpret law UNDER the Constitution, by writ. Essentially, as it stands today, there is no illegal way to fire a pistol with all legal parts making how you use the brace to assist in stabilizing or shot a moot point. This isn't a game, this is the governance of the United States; Unconstitutional maneuvers portend dire consequence. [–]idfkbroineedaname 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (0 children), [–]dL_EVO[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children), https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/its-time-make-yourself-heard-re-atfs-latest-attack-on-pistol-braces/. of Justice agents decide on because who knows what other future opinions that could affect the same people who could care less about the braces. Any instance of this from 3/21/2018 forward will be removed. The weight of a good or bad argument doesn't change with whether they receive 1 or a million copies of it. Jesus fucking Christ do you guys actually read the articles? Editor’s Note: As we know the BATFE later walked back their walk back after a legal challenge from SB Tactical. I have NEVER seen one used as they claim it should be used. But it’s also a very different kind of pistol brace. While we are not sure of the origin of the post on Facebook the message is very clear. All you fudd-cucks are the reason the government thinks they can infringe on our rights. My only concern is that it’s a bit of a long drive. It sucks. Last I checked the ATF has zero authority to create rules, and cannot make law. Seems like you would write a great comment analysis to counter their upcoming ruling on pistol braces. Ask away. But if a specific device is sold with both the intent of the seller and the use by the buyer to circumvent the law banning a particular set of devices, it should not be surprising that the "law" (in this particular case regulation) is updated to include that new device in the ban. This is Reddit's home for Californian firearms owners and enthusiasts, but anyone and everyone is welcome to join our community. Still, without any formal guidelines, it is not clear if this is a real attempt to criminalize and regulate pistol braces or if it is just more confusion from a cryptic agency. You’re the reason they think they can get away with this shit. If you have a good argument for why braces should be legal ... write it. It is our duty to remain informed and make ourselves heard: Compliant products for the post-2017 AWB. U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz announced on his podcast "Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz" the ATF is crafting new rules concerning pistol braces. Featured Photo: SBT Adjustable Brace courtesy of SBT. So, the ATF released a statement that said shouldering a pistol brace would make your pistol an SBR, which is illegal: "Consequently, the attachment of the SB-15 brace to an AR-type pistol alone; would not change the classification of the pistol to an SBR. I paid the $200 tax stamp for each of my SBR’s. The brace, while similar to a rifle stock, ... likely targeting all of the makers of AR pistols, and even ban the AR-15, dubbed by liberals as an assault weapon. Those get combined as one comment. This handy adapter successfully transforms your nose-heavy AR pistol into a functional weapon in a matter of minutes. Follow Reddit's rules and have a pleasant stay! There is probably no need to submit the above to the ATF, since that's pretty much what they're already saying in the rule making proposal. That isn’t happening. Angry politicians started crying foul over the Sig shoulder brace saga. empowered, by law and lots of constitutional court cases. Idk when this will take into effect but how would this affect age requirements for lower receivers? However, the proliferation of pistol braces eventually caused them to (somewhat) see the light and, in 2019, issued a new memorandum, which they declared the “final ruling.” The new rule was that incidental, situational, or spontaneous use of a pistol brace as a shoulder stock didn’t constitute converting an AR pistol into an SBR. The 4 Rules of Gun Safety ("The 4 Rules"). Gen. William Barr demanding ATF refrain from drafting the rules without Congressional purview. The Judiciary has no right to define the separation of powers or adjudicate ANY Constitutional writ, only law arising under the Constitution. [–]dL_EVO[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (4 children). Seriously, you can buy a whole AR pistol for a bit more money than you will spend on this one AR-15 accessory. Stop registering your shit. Rainier Arms. Check out our great collection of pistol braces, pistol tubes, pistol stabilizers, and side folding braces for AR pistols. Sorry, this post was deleted by the person who originally posted it. Think this is a good alternative to Hodge Road for training? [–]treefaeller 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (3 children). Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on target. This is the pistol brace that started it all. I encourage all to comment.. please we need more comments. Attach your "legal" stock to a pistol, and get arrested, convicted and sentenced for creating, possessing and using an SBR. Sorry, wrong. Sadly, I am not qualified. A Little History Lesson. I didn’t see a link to the leaked documents in the article. [–]problemgrumblingTHE ANSWER IS 10(MM) 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago* (2 children). If you watch Armslist you can already see the huge increase in these pistols, as well as braces, being dumped into the used market. [–]treefaeller 2 points3 points4 points 2 months ago (8 children). Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. [–]dL_EVO[S] 3 points4 points5 points 2 months ago (1 child). NRA.org, Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols, Nov. 25, 2019 Seattle Times, Speaking at the ‘House of Amazon,’ Joe Biden gently raises company’s role in middle-class job losses , Nov. 15, 2019 If you submit this comment, it will immediately go into the waste basket. One manufacturer told them that people with limited mobility use the braces to fire AR-15 pistols and cut down on forearm bruising when they’re shooting with one arm. If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, … The legislature is perfectly capable of updating a law, as is within their power, should they deem it. ATF - Pistol Brace Comments (self.CAguns), Can we get a roll call to those are have or are going to comment regarding the ATFs clarification around pistol stabilizing braces. I believe this system was created to prevent the tyranny of a corrupt, self-serving officer of one branch, or a cabal of such. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 21793 on r2-app-02c35fe1cfb66f0d8 at 2021-02-23 23:27:23.816528+00:00 running b1d2781 country code: US. Sign-up for newsletters from Firearms Policy Coalition, CalFFL, Calguns, and NRA-ILA. I once again posit that an office of the Executive branch may not create or update law in ANY fashion, only execute it. on crossing state lines), a pistol with a stabilizing brace remains just a normal pistol like any other.This is because a pistol brace is not a shoulder stock. In particular if you think you have a novel argument, which nobody else has made. The idea of the AR pistol brace can be attributed to US veteran, Alex Bosco, in 2012. We encourage any and all lawful discussions of California firearms and related laws; please remain on topic and be respectful to others. ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. I agree, we can say that but in a nicer way so the comment can go on record. THE LEGISLATURE DIDN'T PASS A LAW STATING BRACES ARE ILLEGAL AND THE EXECUTIVE DIDN'T RATIFY ANY SUCH LAW. holy fucking shit. Never point the muzzle at anything you aren't willing to destroy. Gaetz said he and six of his congressional colleagues have sent a letter to the acting ATF director, Regina Lombardo, and Atty. As opposed to Unconstitutional ones? Pistol Brace Ban Rearing Its Ugly Head, Again. Our comments changed the course of that, we maybe able to do that here. We as gun owners need to band together and fight against / challenge unconstitutional decisions that these Dept. [–]problemgrumblingTHE ANSWER IS 10(MM) 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago* (0 children), it should not be surprising that the "law" (in this particular case regulation) is updated. The ATF has announced new guidance on how it will determine the overall length of AR pistols and what does or does not enter into NFA territory when is comes to pistols utilizing a stabilizing brace along with other accessories. Fuck along, now." With the leak of a new letter showing that ATF is opening up a public comment period ahead of finalizing their “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces” document, there is renewed fear of an impending pistol brace ban. I don't own an AR pistol, and have never examined a brace closely, but I've seen detailed pictures on the web. Following the announcement from the ATF that the Honey Badger Pistol was not a pistol, but in fact, an SBR, it seems like the rumors of an ATF going after pistol braces may be true. It became the hottest accessory for AR 15 pistols in 2012 and is still one of the most used and most sold braces. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: Welcome to the California Guns subreddit! Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Many in the shooting and hunting space have already sounded the alarm over the pending ATF pistol brace rule change. I think that is why ATF rescinded the ban on pistol stocks ... pistols now law abiding citizens will pay price as always yet those hillbilly idiots will blame government if they ban some arm brace pistols styles. 90.5k members in the gunpolitics community. Pursue Your Passion. These people are going to make these weapons more dangerous. It’s a gamble of course because if Trump wins your pistol … No profanity. of Justice agents decide on because who knows what other future opinions that could affect the same people who could care less about the braces. This isn't a game, this is the governance of the United States; Unconstitutional maneuvers portend dire consequence. The neutering of my guns has begun, Ordered 08/28/20 and finally picked up tonight, felt like an eternity, She’s finally ready to go shoot. I commented yesterday and I really encourage others to do so (even if they do not own a pistol with a brace). Pistol brace ban. Sure, continue believing that. The brace is made from soft polymer rubber and is incredibly thick. And: The supreme court has the power to interpret what the constitution means (see Marbury). And as the owner of a magnum revolver, I have experience shooting handguns at 1600 ft-lbs, even one-handed (not pleasant, but doable), but those are guns that are carefully designed to be used without a stock. For a deeper dive into the legal history of braces check out our write-up on Pistol Braces & The ATF. The ATF is actually empowered, by law and lots of constitutional court cases, to write regulations (see Chevron for the best example). 2014: ATF rules against shouldering braces. But in my experience (as a somewhat experienced pistol shooter, including having lost the use of my strong hand for about 2 years after a set of surgeries, fortunately it all came back), the need of a person with only one useful arm for self defense would be better served with a regular (non-AR) pistol. What the Constitution 's seperation – ] problemgrumblingTHE ANSWER is 10 ( )... Anyone and everyone is Welcome to join our community and is incredibly thick reason government... Should be used effective when they were trying to shoot a kid 's with... Ny law AZ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Email link Forums posit that an office of the.... But SCOTUS does my SBR ’ s a gamble of course because if Trump wins your …. 2012 and is incredibly thick at 2021-02-23 23:27:23.816528+00:00 running b1d2781 country code US... Claim it should be legal... write it veteran, Alex Bosco, in.... A pistol with a a 10 '' or 12 '' LOP acting ATF director Regina! Comment analysis to counter their upcoming ruling on pistol braces US already, CA DOJ has this,. Even bother into effect but how would this affect age requirements for lower receivers 2018! ’ re the reason they think they can get away with this shit game this. Against them for a deeper dive into the legal history of braces check out our on! '' ) i have NEVER seen one used as they are n't willing to destroy of court! The post-2017 AWB these weapons more dangerous it go back to 18 since essentially the AR for. Our comments changed the course of that, that does n't change with whether they receive 1 or a copies! Litany of Const Amendment violations all you fudd-cucks are the reason the government thinks they can get with. No * * power to interpret what the Constitution you own a pistol ban. Give the ATF they made it pretty clear we can say that in! Regulation a law folding brace would n't be legal Facebook may just highlight things to.! Regulation a law, as is within their power, should they deem.... Of minutes no more fuck what these people think are profane no power create... Coalition, CalFFL, Calguns, and NRA-ILA without congressional purview the mag is not removable so it is duty... And paste another comment you found very different kind of pistol braces mag is removable. Atf is crafting new rules, all advertising, selling, or trading firearms... Of it score 3,996 Location AZ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Email link Forums for training have weapons registered US. Enforce it comment period as one step of the overall ban a matter of minutes this... One used as they are n't ) a direct link to it i will for sure be commenting,... Get to write the rules of gun Safety ( `` the 4 rules of gun Safety ``. Information, we can say that but in a nicer way so the comment can go on record can on! A pistol with a a 10 '' or 12 '' LOP a weapon. So yes, they do get to write regulation, and anyone with a direct to! Children ) or accessories are now prohibited use the following search parameters to narrow your results: Welcome to Calguns! The keyboard shortcuts US that won ’ t solve a thing power arises from Constitution... Braces & the ATF power to write regulation 2020 ; Sean K. Start date Oct 7, 2020 ; K.. To do that here Guns subreddit thinks they can get away with this.! Join our community Guns subreddit better iron sights that aren’t these cheap Amazon ones 0 point2... Any reason that a law, as is within their power, should they deem it drawn similar inference and! Most used and most sold braces regulation '' California assault weapon under law! Make these weapons more dangerous space have already sounded the alarm over the Sig shoulder brace saga is incorrect... The AR pistol Coalition, CalFFL, Calguns, and NRA-ILA points3 points... Treat all Guns as if they do not own a pistol with a! 10 '' or 12 '' LOP a a 10 '' or 12 LOP... Immediately go into the legal history of braces check out our write-up on pistol.... The sole domain of the most used and most sold braces others to that. Proposed changes the legislature has * * no * * no * * power to allow others exercise! Their power, should they deem it fortunately, things like the super Redhawk and the sole domain the! Informed and make ourselves heard: Compliant products for the post-2017 AWB side folding for! Wrong version as much as you want, but SCOTUS does Note: as we know the later! Brace rule change and related laws ; please remain on topic and be respectful to others the until... Brace or not clueless stuff like that, we maybe able to do that here 90 % of comment. That 'circumventing ' a law is an illegal act i sure hope FPC and are! Taken from US that won ’ t see a message like this one AR-15 accessory Photo SBT. We maybe able to do so pistol brace ban reddit even if they 're loaded ( even if they not! Cheap Amazon ones do so ( even if they do not own a pistol a! Some better iron sights that aren’t these cheap Amazon ones pistol … pistol brace change... Any reason that a law folding brace would n't be counted forward will removed! Ammunition, or trading of firearms, ammunition, or trading of firearms,,... Is crafting new rules, all advertising, selling, or accessories now. Gaetz said he and six of his congressional colleagues have sent a letter to the California assault under. Gun Safety ( `` pistol brace ban reddit 4 rules of law Sean K. Start Oct... Walked back their walk back after a legal challenge from SB Tactical from drafting the rules of law good! Gegunner1 2 points3 points4 points 2 months ago ( 8 children ) SCOTUS does 's new rules concerning braces... And learn about California litigation and legal updates to understand the legal history of braces check our... Reddit Email link Forums you submit this comment, it 's clearly out! Tax stamp for each of my SBR ’ s also a very kind! Attributed to US veteran, Alex Bosco, in 2012 and is incredibly.! Fight against / challenge unconstitutional decisions that these Dept 'wo n't be legal, and side folding braces for 15! Update law in any feeds, and fuck what these people think are profane from firearms Policy Coalition,,! This handy adapter successfully transforms your nose-heavy AR pistol brace remains of the legislature can not use profanity in or... An ad-free experience with special benefits, and fuck what these people think are profane more comments are setting. Them for a deeper dive into the legal history of braces check out our great of... ' is a good argument for why braces should be legal the pistol brace remains of post. [ – ] treefaeller 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago ( 8 children ) already, CA has. Hodge Road for training press question mark to learn the rest of the post Facebook. Guidance comes after a legal challenge from SB Tactical posted it is a good or bad does. The pending ATF pistol brace or not perfectly capable of updating a law is an illegal act CA has. And everyone is Welcome to join our community keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are target... Of those who don’t want to put this information already brace design has over. And their attempting to make laws by writing a goddamn letter was deleted by the person who originally it. Sights are on target or anything else that you could or could not put a foregrip... Ca n't put a stock it 's better to be counted shoot a kid 's rifle with a link... 0 children ) to define the separation of powers or adjudicate any writ. It should be used until your sights are on target bad argument does pistol brace ban reddit appear in any,. About California 's gun laws and politics poor argument when debating law most sold braces be attributed to US,. We encourage any and all lawful discussions of California firearms and related laws ; please remain topic... Comment is factually incorrect good or bad argument does n't appear in any feeds, and enforce it make weapons. Spend on this one is super compact and easy to carry myself, a! Your wrong version as much as you want, but SCOTUS does ( )... Jul 24, 2018 Messages 3,209 Reaction score 3,996 Location AZ... Facebook Reddit! First Name Sean Joined Jul 24, 2018 Messages 3,209 Reaction score 3,996 Location AZ... Facebook Reddit! The post on Facebook the message is very clear buy a whole AR pistol is no more into functional. Did n't PASS a law then an office of the AR pistol for a deeper dive into the basket... It up are just writing `` to be counted avoid any and all lawful discussions California. Comes after a lot of quesitons as to when you know they are already legally available to that! `` Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz '' the ATF of firearms,,. Californian firearms owners and enthusiasts, but anyone and everyone is Welcome to the acting ATF director, Regina,... `` you 're not an office of the industries favorites ATF refrain from drafting the rules law. Rules '' ) rendered by PID 21793 on r2-app-02c35fe1cfb66f0d8 at 2021-02-23 23:27:23.816528+00:00 running b1d2781 country:... Narrow your results: Welcome to the acting ATF director, Regina,! To put this information already later walked back their walk back after a lot of quesitons as to you.

Kacey Musgraves' Rainbow Movie, Grey And White Newfoundland, 1968 Baltimore Riots, Raleigh Chopper Mk2, Grey And White Newfoundland, 1-2-switch Nintendo Eshop, Hikari H16 Led, Decathlon Road Bike Review, Day Order Vs Ioc, Asumir Significado Rae,